whether-rules-14-g-and-h-are-applicable-to-habeas-corpus-petition

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Rules 14 (g) and (h) are not applicable to a petition for writ of habeas corpus to the Supreme Court of the United States that has original jurisdiction. 2. Whether being in federal custody is a substantial taking, a denial, a concrete injury of Petitioner’s constitutional right of liberty, without “sufficient cause,” without compelling reasons for the United States Congress to proscribe marijuana as a dangerous substance, a drug crime, therefore without due process of law contravening Amendments IV and V of the Constitution of the United States, and is unconstitutional, vacating his convictions, restoring his liberty. i PARTY TO THE PROCEEDING Edwin W, Rubis is in the custody of: , Ms. M. Kimberly, Warden FCI Talladega Federal Correctional Institution ; 565 East Renfroe Road Talladega, AL 35160 RELATED CRIMINAL CASE United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas United States of America v. Edwin W. Rubis H-98-CR-57, 8/17/1999. Citation unknown. APPENDLY’S