No. 22-7596
Ripdaman Narula v. Superior Court of California, Orange County, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights crime-reporting criminal-procedure default-judgment due-process judicial-procedure judicial-review law-enforcement pro-se standing victim-rights
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
pro-se-rights,default-judgment,crime-reporting,police-obligations,crime-victim-rights,judicial-power
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED: Question # 1. A pro se has a right to file a complaint in the court. Does he also has a right to win especially if defendant(s) default? Question # 2: When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for a victim of a crime to file a crime report, do cops have an obligation to take a crime report and record victim’s statement(s) truthfully? . Question # 3: Is the MJ’s bagman more important and/or more powerful than anyone else including the court of appeal?
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-06
Waiver of right of respondents Orange County Sheriff's Department and City of Laguna Niguel to respond filed.
2023-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent City of Santa Ana to respond filed.
2023-04-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2023)
Attorneys
Orange County Sheriff's Department and City of Laguna Niguel
Christina M. Sprenger — Lawrence Beach Allen & Choi, PC, Respondent
Christina M. Sprenger — Lawrence Beach Allen & Choi, PC, Respondent