Was recusal mandatory under § 455(b)(1) and § 144 and § 455(a) where the trial judge's activities involved disputed evidentiary facts and a reasonable person might question the judge's ability to remain impartial?

Questions Presented 1. Was recusal mandatory under § 455(b )(1) where the trial judge's administrative activities had involved her in "disputed evidentiary facts? 2. Was recusal mandatory under § 144 and § 455(a) where a reasonable person might question [the judge's] ability to remain impartial in hearing the case after learning material facts from an extrajudicial source? 3. If recusal is mandatory, would any subsequent orders be void? | Lo Il.