No. 22-7604
Harbans Singh v. United States
IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process hearsay immigration interpreter-testimony sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an interpreter's hearsay statements are subject to Confrontation Clause analysis, particularly when the statements themselves constitute the crime charged?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Whether an interpreter’s hearsay statements are subject to Confrontation Clause analysis, particularly when the statements themselves constitute the crime charged? ‘
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-18
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-07-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 18, 2023.
2023-07-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 20, 2023 to August 18, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-06-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 20, 2023.
2023-06-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 20, 2023 to July 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 20, 2023)
Attorneys
Harbans Singh
Andrew David Kennedy — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Andrew David Kennedy — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent