Should a judge recuse themselves having learned through their administrative duties, material facts deriving from an extrajudicial source?

Questions Presented 1. Should a judge recuse themselves having learned through their administrative duties, material facts deriving from an extrajudicial source? 2. Does judicial immunity protect limited jurisdictional judges from liability for personal actions not taken in the judge's judicial capacity or in clear absence of their jurisdiction or for the illegal acts of other co-conspirators? ; . 8.Is Bivens appropriate because this court is better equipped to decide claims for the unconstitutional acts of individual federal judges, who utilize the machinery of the court to retaliate or deter citizens from participating in court? | 4. Does the Complaint plausibly allege violations of 42 U.S. Code § 1985(2)(Clause i) and 42 U.S. Code § 1986 that are not frivolous? 5. Does 42 U.S.C. 1985(2) (clause i) require classor race-based discriminatory animus allegations or allegations of force, intimidation, threat, or retaliation? 6. On the facts before it, did the District court err in law and fact by mis-applying the facts on record to the correct legal standard of proof by applying collateral estoppel in a still open case and then dismissing the action for want of jurisdiction on that basis? | 7. Arve defendant attorneys Eck and Schwartz entitled derivative immunity?