Is it ethical or legal for the Southern District Court of New York's Judge, Jesse M Furman to disregard every shred of evidence presented by the Plaintiff?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Is it ethical or legal for the Southern District Court of New York’s Judge, Jesse M Furman to disregard every shred of evidence presented by the Judge Furman claims that “This internal complaint appears to be the document filed at ECF No. 185-10, but, as there is no “foundation from a witness with personal knowledge” authenticating the document, the Court cannot and will not consider it.” Judge Furman used two of his own cases to substantiate his opinion.” Page 5 footnote 6 of the OPINION AND ORDER. This internal complaint is the catalyst which precipitated every event in this case including this Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari. 2. Should evidence presented to the Defendant’s counsel at their discovery be blatantly ignored by Judge Furman because it does not substantiate his and the Defendants’ narrative. Page 25, footnote13 of the OPINION AND ORDER. “The audio recording and the transcript Maragh submitted can and will remain under seal, both for the reasons Defendants gave previously, see . ECF No. 204, and because the court did not rely on these materials in any way.” Here Judge Furman makes it emphatically clear that he is bias and unethical. 3. Should the United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit designate evidence as inadmissible, when it was not deemed inadmissible by The Southern District Court Of New York? “The District Court concluded, in fact that the audio recording and transcript were inadmissible, and therefore declined to rely on them in granting summary judgment.” Page 5 — 6 of the United States Court Of Appeal For The Second Circuit’s Summary Order. Yes, Judge Furman did not rely on the audio recording or the transcript; however, at no point during this proceeding, did Judge Furman classify the audio recording and the transcript as inadmissible. This panel consisting of Debra Ann Livingston, Chief Judge, Amalya L. Kearse, and Michael H. Park, Circuit Judge are the only individuals who have. 4. Should the United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit violate its ordinances and mandates? “This Court reviews orders granting summary judgment de novo, “resolv[ing] all ambiguities and draw[ing] all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,” Page 2 of the Summary Order. This aspiration, condition and objective have not been met in this case. On the contrary, the United States Court Of Appeal For The Second Circuit blatantly misrepresented the facts-of this case and appeal. The United States Court Of Appeal For The Second Circuit, instead created ambiguities, by drawing unreasonable inferences; in its quest to favor the moving party. Thereby denying the Appellant/nonmoving party his constitutional rights and due process of law. 5. Should the Southern District Court of New York and The United States Court Of Appeal For The Second Circuit, seal, designate as confidential and protective and blatantly disregard evidence? This occurred in this case to fulfill this requirement. “Summary judgment is appropriate only if “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitle to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ.P. 56(a). A genuine dispute exists “if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the . nonmoving party.” Page 2 -3 Summary Order.”