Should the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit have accepted a corrected notice of appeal involving failure to sign, in conflict with Becker v. Montgomery?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. Should the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit have accepted a corrected notice of appeal, which involved failure of Nanette Abao to sign a notice of appeal, that was "corrected promptly [ See Appx. E, page 14,25,28:]| after being called to the attention of { the ] party", in the Novenber 7, 2022, Order, See Appx. A, page 5. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); The decision in conflict with Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757 (S. Ct. 2001) (Which involved failure to sign a notice of appeal, the Supreme Court noted Rule 11 provides "omission of the signature" may be “corrected promptly after ‘being called to the attention of the attorney or party." id. at 764)? 2. Is the continued withholding of material evidence, by the Michigan Court of Appeals Clerk, after request and payment for copies, a violation © of 14th Amendment right to due process, under Brady:v. Maryland 373 U.S. ~""33-(S. Ct. 1963) where the evidence "might affect the outcome of the = t—t suit under [ Hague Conv. Art. 12 “settled environment" ] governing law." Anderson v. Liberty {Lobby Inc., 477 U.S. 242, at 248 (S. Ct. 1986). : Materiality of evidence, Complaint raised to Chief Clerk, [ See Appx. F. page 1-5 J? 3. Should the petition under ICARA be granted for the return of the Filipino child ZC. to his mother and brother Z.C/2 in the Philippines, ~ with the Sixth Circuit Court's conclusion " that the ‘District Court ; erred in sua sponte raising { affirmative defenses ] to conclude that Cunningham had failed to state a claim of relief'’ under 28 USC 1915 (e) : (2). Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199,216 (2007); after taking “tudicial CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE ; , ia ee QUESTION(S) PRESENTED CONTINUED — . "° Notice of portions of transcripts from [Cunningham's |] state , : “criminal trial for forcibly kidnapping his son." See Appx. A, . _ page 1; Transcripts detailing the knowing and intentional removal . of birth certificate evidence to be offered. in present or future . official proceeding, from the Sheriff vault by the Quinns, at the . a direction of ‘Prosecutor Sadler, used in an illegal international = adoption of the child, without notice of pendency of proceedings . to mother or father, nor consent; concealed by willfully false testimony under oath concerning a material matter, by Paul Quinn, bet. Mitchell, and Det. Erickson, in denial of due process and , equal protection of law, in an "unsettled environment". See Appx. . , A, page 3, Hague Conv. Art. 12 : . : QUESTION(S) PRESENTED CONCLUDED oe ib