No. 22-7619

Earl Anderson v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights corporate-disclosure dismissal district-court due-process in-forma-pauperis standing supplemental-complaint
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Appellate Court erred in affirming the dismissal of Petitioner Andersen's Original Complaint

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : ¢_ Quest ions Presented For Review a , 1. Whether the Appellate Court erred incatfirnind the dismissal of. ., Petitioner Andersen ’s Original Complaint 2 Xx Whether the Apyellete Court erred in affirming the District Courts Order ety i King Petitioner Andepson’s Supplemerifal Complaint ? (Amended /Supelemental Complerint.) 2 th Be, , Jb _ Case: 3:21-cv-00531-JGC Doc #: 8 Filed: 06/10/21 1 o0f1. PagelD #: 66 ; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ; NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO | : Earl Anderson, #317-265 F . , og : : 1) . Case No. 1:21-cev-00531-JCG ; Aramark Corporation . Corporate Disclosure Statemeh Pursuant to the

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-08
Waiver of right of respondent Aramark Correctional Services, LLC to respond filed.
2023-04-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 22, 2023)

Attorneys

Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Kristin L. WedellDickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C., Respondent
Kristin L. WedellDickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C., Respondent
Earl Anderson
Earl Anderson — Petitioner
Earl Anderson — Petitioner