Whether the Supreme Court should order the use of a 'Headman Deference' doctrine for alimony-related servitude

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether the United States Supreme Court should order the use of a deference doctrine (referred to as “Headman Deference” outlined in this petition) that sets forth tests which must be applied to all lower-court actions seeking to impose . alimony-related servitude upon a citizen in the absence of a written pre-nuptial agreement. UW. Whether (1) a disregard of a demand for trial by jury; (2) a refusal to issue declaratory judgements defining the legal relationship between parties and their rights in a matter before the court; (3) threats of or actual ordering of jail time; (4) the issuance of labels; and/or (5) interpretations of legal terms contrary to their legal 7 meaning or similar denials of due process; without the existence of a pre-nuptial agreement ; before imposing alimony servitude, constitutes court coercion into involuntary-alimony ; . | servitude in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. MI. Whether any Court Officer, who participates in the imposition of alimony in excess of one; year without the existence of a pre-nuptial agreement, imposing terms of alimony servitude . in excess of one year, without applying the Headman Deference test, shall be guilty of criminal “knowingly and willfully” holding a person in involuntary servitude in violation of Title 18, U.S.C., Sec. 1584 Sale into involuntary servitude. : IV. Whether any employer or other party, who does not apply Headman Deference before | imposing terms of servitude against an individual's will, shall be deemed to “obstruct(s], attempt[s] to obstruct, or in any way interfere[s] with or prevent[s] the enforcement of” . Title 18, U.S.C., Sec. 1584 Sale into involuntary servitude and shall be subject to being ; “fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both”. i