Whether a district court can force counsel upon a person even without inquiring the provisions set forth in §3006(A)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : this case presents an important issue concerning what : constitutes "the right to have the assistance of counsel" under : the Sixth. Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This. Petition presents the opportunity for this Court to provide a’ BRIGHT LINE that defines the specific intent of Congress, thus holding the lower courts accountable to this Court's jurisprudence. . 1. ) Whether a district court can force counsel upon a person even without inquiring the provisions set forth in §3006(A); . 2. Whether a district court can “force counsel upon a person even after the person time and again fired the counsel in open court, and after the fact that the district court © ‘acknowledged that the person never waived his/her right to assistance of counsel, but still forced counsel without the accused's permission, consent, or consent by assent; and 3. Whether a Circuit Court can disregard and/or ignore the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as unconstitutionally void-for-vagueness, and thus, give a Circuit : Court the consent to ignore both this Court's jurisprudence as : well as its own: precedent rule with regards to the Sixth Amendment's "right to have the assistance of counsel."