Did the defendants violate the U.S. Constitutional protections related to marital relationships by imposing a blanket ban on spousal communication for over two years, even though all forms of communication were monitored for security purposes?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Did the defendants vielate the US. Constrhahonal protechons odlovcadl to marital reledionshups by wenposing & blanket ban of aff spouse! communtestion for over hoo years, even tho wah | Forms of communication were monitored for Securhy purposes C ari he delerdocl blanket ban on spousal Communicalcon violate S. asth ution hy Preven hoo Married incarcerstid ° codefendants from ciate establish untied prdendled delense ¢ 3, be “tae defendants Tail Mail Waddh List vislate Ye US. Consibelo cl ? chons of unleHered communication Heroush Ye warrantless encom duhao US. Maw! totrd perches whl, : a ond o oceender Peenes wehch Xe . 4. Does an uvarceradid Yo) ) ant 5 af mal protecled Status? rf so we Saal idee Yn ees , Constthetion Haroush ‘He warrantless open; rasking hatoe ; ond providing cops ot lacmhtR’ uncon; "aad ove Tis ond the Oppaseng progecaloy 7 ; me