No. 22-7648

In Re William M. Windsor

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-05-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure exceptional-circumstances federal-court-jurisdiction federal-court-order in-forma-pauperis judicial-review jurisdiction-challenge state-court-authority void-orders
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a federal court order void when jurisdiction is never determined?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Petitioner brought suit in Case No. 2011-CV-200971 in the Superior Court of Fulton County Georgia for Violation of state laws. Case No. 2011-CV-200971 was unlawfully removed to federal court where the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (‘DISTRICT COURT) never addressed the removal and never determined jurisdiction. A series of Void Orders and Void Judgments were issued by the DISTRICT COURT, including Permanent Injunction Orders that purported to deny William M. Windsor (“WINDSOR) the right to file any action in a state court anywhere in America. WINDSOR was denied appeals by wrongful denial of In Forma Pauperis status. This Petition arises out of orders in the DISTRICT COURT and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ELEVENTH CIRCUIT (“11TH CIRCUIT”). 1. Is a federal court order void when jurisdiction is never determined? If so, every order of the DISTRICT COURT and 11TH CIRCUIT are invalid, and this Court’s task is simple. 0. Does a federal court judge lack jurisdiction to place restrictions on the operation of state courts? Ill. Isa federal court order placing restrictions on the operation of state courts a void order? TV. Did the 11TH CIRCUIT err by denying appeals of William M. Windsor (“WINDSOR”) that incorporate the jurisdiction issue and the state court authority issue? | | | V. Did the DISTRICT COURT and the 11TH CIRCUIT err by denying In Forma Pauperis status to WINDSOR? VI. Are there exceptional circumstances that require this Court to issue a Writ? | e wv ]

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-05-23
Application (22A1009) to file petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition in excess of page limits granted by Justice Thomas. The petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition may not exceed 49 pages.
2023-05-10
Application (22A1009) to file petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition in excess of page limits, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2023-05-10
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 26, 2023)

Attorneys

United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
William M. Windsor
William M. Windsor — Petitioner
William M. Windsor — Petitioner