Jason Harriman v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
whether-the-government-violated-constitutional-rights
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 7 . 1. Whether the Government vidlated Mr. Harriman's Sixth and Eighth Amendment Constitution‘al Rights and suppress evidentiary material of exculpatory value ‘from the Discovery pro; , “duced to ‘the Defense ‘thus conmitting a Brady Violation? ; . oo 2. Whether Mr: Harriman's Trial counsel and Appellate Counsel did violate Mr. Harriman's | . Sixth Amendment Rights and fail to provide adequate counsel on his behalf and meet_ the : standard as being Ineffective Assistance of Counsel? : ; . . 3. Whether the District Court violated Mr. Harriman's Sixthoand Eighth Amendment: Constit1: utional Rights, as.well as his Rights to Due Process in accordance of the Federal Rules ; , and Procedure on several issues and abuse its judicial discretion? (1) Was Mr. Harriman's Rights violated when the District Court denied Mr. Harriman's request for new counsel Oo on TWO seperate occassions prior to his trial? (2) Were Mr.. Harriman's rights violated : by the court repeatedly denying Mr. Harriman to have access to his discovery in his S23in‘ preparing his appeal? (3) whether the court abused its discretion and violated the Rights Mr. Harriman is due and denying him the right to an Evidentiary Hearing and . : Counsel to be appointed due to the complexities of the issues and to gather evidentiary . i-ottems Mr. Harriman couldn't while incarcerated in prison, when more then Meéting the . burden and showing cause to have his claim viewed and investigated in greater detail by the court? | . : . . 4/27/2023