Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED For the Court’s consideration and determination regarding issues involved in my criminal case, and consideration for adults in rape cases: . 1. That the Court rule that the term “victim,” when referring to those who have accused a defendant, not be used unless and until there has been a guilty verdict determined. 2. That the Court determine that in a rape case, the accuser is subjected to the same investigative tactics, practices, and uncovered personal information, including personal names of the accusers, background information, etc., as is applied to the one accused. Equal protection under the law ~ Fourteenth Amendment. 3. I was not submitted Miranda rights at the time of my arrest — Exhibits 5 and 6. 4. That pursuant to the Constitutional Right of the Sixth Amendment, the Court determine that in a rape case, the accuser must attend all hearings — that there cannot be a substitute, whether a detective or law enforcement officer or administrator attending a hearing and testifying on behalf of the accuser or instead of the accuser against the accused; that all hearings that the accused must attend the accuser must attend. 5. Would the Court find in cases of the accusation of rape, where both parties are adults and both parties are intoxicated, that the argument of responsibility be to both parties and not solely on the male, and the charge contain language of mitigating circumstances when both are intoxicated — the term mitigating start at a 50/50 equal responsibility. Fourteenth Amendment — equal protection under the law. 6. Would the Court decide on a limitation for a judge’s “discretion” when sentencing ~ Eighth Amendment, Cruel and Unusual Punishment. 7. That immunity for judges, law enforcement, prosecutors, and those extended immunity when dealing with legal procedure, legal process, or criminal prosecution must be eliminated, severely curtailed, or a point for withdrawal, so that immunity is not a license to circumvent the 2 United States Constitution, or laws governing a person’s rights, or legal avenues for justice, nor an excuse for perjury at trial, and denial of Due Process. 8. That the Court determine a national count for a laboratory result when the question is intoxication or drugs involved, where the person relying on the lab result could be incarcerated because one laboratory result is different than the result from another laboratory — Exhibit 8. 9. That the Court determine that the religion of an accused and whether the accused lived by the tenets of his religion not be used against the accused at any time, nor at any hearing — First Amendment. 10. Ifan accused person, during interrogation or initial interview, requests a polygraph, is he/she entitled to have a polygraph? 11. That the Court determine that monies submitted on behalf of an incarcerated person not be used to pay a restitution amount owed by the incarcerated person because the monies are outof-pocket money from family to help the incarcerated person, and not to pay a bill to the accusers, the state, city, or county. 12. | Would the court clearly direct to what entity a citizen can go in order to report the corrupt activities within the legal system of a city and/or county — I refer specifically to San Diego, California, and the courts, law enforcement, and legal system I experienced there. | ; eC