Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's RICO and BIVENS complaints

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioner contends California defendant officers, and agents engaged in conspiracy cover-up of corruption in promoting themselves, intimidation, stalking, threats, retaliation for prior litigation, mail fraud, and is presently still in danger with these California and Arizona police racketeering gangs engagement in Horrible and Evil acts towards petitioner in the States of California, Minnesota, and Maryland. Petitioner’s pain and suffering with extreme difficulties walking due to his double hernia, in which petitioner received surgery after approximately 16 months with the Light House Shelter assistance. In addition, petitioner appointment for surgery with Doctor Saunders at Glenn Burnie Hospital made it impossible for petitioner to litigate RICO case where he pursued a Motion to Stay with Court explaining, that petitioner had a surgery scheduled with Doctor Saunders, however, this motion was denied by District Court on May 16th, 2022. In addition petitioner submitted two online complaints with the F.B.L., and U.S. Post Master Dejoy for mail fraud, in which petitioner did not. receive his ; identification card, nor any answer from the online complaints. Petitioner submitted a general form In Forma Pauperis with the Light House Shelter address, which was denied. Petitioner then filed a motion for reconsideration In Forma Pauperis, which was granted by District Court on May 16th 2022. Petitioner also, filed a Motion for dismissal against respondents Minnesota Post Office, and Maryland Social services, which was denied by District Court on May 16th, 2022. Also, on May 27th, 2022, petitioner submitted an amended Rico complaint with respondents addresses in summons, however, on July 29th, 2022, the District Court denied petitioners amended RICO complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15, where the Court makes no mention of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4 in the decision, nor were respondents served with summons, or complaint. In addition petitioner filed a BIVENS complaint against F.B.L, Director Christopher Wray. Furthermore, petitioner submitted a writ of mandate and motion to stay, in which petitioners RICO and BIVENS complaint are intertwined. Lastly, Petitioner did in fact submitted two amended complaints on time dated May 12th and May 27th 2022, and did in fact submit all defendants addresses within summons. PARTIES _ All parties do not appear in the caption of this case on the cover page. A list of all