No. 22-7697
Kenneth Brown, Jr. v. Pennsylvania, et al.
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: act-84 civil-rights constitutional-challenge constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea sentencing separation-of-powers statutory-interpretation void-ab-initio
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Act 84, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9728(b)(5) is Unconstitutional
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . I. Whether Act 84, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9728(b)(5) is Unconstitutional on its Face as Violative of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania so Constitution and/or the Separation of Powers Doctrine? Tl. Whether the Amendment to Act 84 is Unconstitutional as Applied to Petitioner as Violative of Both Pennsylvania and United States Constitution? IIL. Whether Petitioner's Guilty Plea and Sentence is Void ~ because Act 84 is Void ab Initio on its face, or as applied to Petitioner? , ; ‘ | ‘ | : | | @ -@ |
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-10
Brief of respondents Pennsylvania, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-08-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 10, 2023. See Rule 30.1.
2023-08-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 24, 2023 to October 9, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-07-25
Response Requested. (Due August 24, 2023)
2023-07-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Pennsylvania, et al.
Daniel Barrett Mullen — Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Respondent
Daniel Barrett Mullen — Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Respondent
Tara J Wikhian — PA Department of Corrections, Respondent
Tara J Wikhian — PA Department of Corrections, Respondent