No. 22-7703

Jacob Patrick Krafft v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process presumption-of-reasonableness sentencing-guidelines substantive-reasonableness within-guidelines-sentence
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

How does a court of appeals determine whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption of reasonableness when the defendant is challenging the substantive reasonableness of a within-Guidelines sentence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW How does a court of appeals determine whether a defendant has rebutted the presumption of reasonableness when the defendant is challenging the substantive reasonableness of a withinGuidelines sentence? No. In the Supreme Court of the United States JACOB PATRICK KRAFFT, PETITIONER, Vv. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Petitioner Jacob Patrick Krafft asks that a writ of certiorari issue to review the opinion and judgment entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on March 7, 20238.

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2023)

Attorneys

Jacob Patrick Krafft
Kristin L. DavidsonFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kristin L. DavidsonFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent