Did the Montana judicial branch violate US Supreme Court precedent by denying petitioner relief under United States v. Morgan?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED — ; I. Did, the Judicial Branch of Montana in denying Petitioner : the opportunity for relief under Precedent Holding UnitedStates v. Morgan, 346 US 502, (1954), by stating, Coram Nobis has been abolished in the State of. Montana violate United States: Supreme Court Precedent Law?. II. Did, the Judicial Branch of Montana violate the United States Constitution Article VI, and Amendment 14, (Due Process) and ; Amendment VI, (Petitioner's Right to Counsel) by changing his lawful Motion under Morgan, into a State Collateral PostConviction Petition?. | IIL. Did, the State of Montana specifically in it's legislature 7 and Judicial Branch violate Federal Law by passing and enforcing Rule 60(e) abolishing Coram Nobis in disregard of the United States Supreme Court Precedent Case Law, UnitedStates v. Morgan, 346 US 502, (1954),?. I. Is, the Montana State Judicial Branch in Contempt of the United States Supreme Court by ignoring United States Supreme ~ Court Precedent Case Law, United States v. Morgan, 346 US 502, (1954), denying Petitioner relief under Morgan which authorizes ~ i said relief via Petitioner's Motion in the Nature of Writ of Error Coram Nobis?. . ; 1