No. 22-7760
Todji Kijuan Martin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attempt-crime attempt-crimes criminal-interpretation criminal-law force-definition statutory-construction statutory-interpretation substantive-crime supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-taylor use-of-force
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court's 2022 opinion in United States v. Taylor is applicable to all attempt crimes particularly when the crime in question may be committed by a means that does not require use of force?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether this Court’s 2022 opinion in United States v. Taylor, is applicable to all attempt crimes particularly when the crime in question may be committed by a means that does not required use of force? i
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 12, 2023)
Attorneys
Todji Martin
Mark Edwin Brown — Menefee & Brown, P.C., Petitioner
Mark Edwin Brown — Menefee & Brown, P.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent