Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that petitioner waived any speedy-trial objection

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that petitioner waived any speedy-trial objection to the period of delay after his motion to dismiss for violation of the Speedy Trial Act was filed because he did not also file an additional motion to dismiss on the eve of trial, even though his dismissal motion challenged the lengthy trial continuance the district court had ordered and the resulting trial date set, and the district court addressed that time period when denying it. ii