No. 22-7766
Ramon Ramirez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction constitutional-law criminal-jurisdiction criminal-procedure district-court federal-courts interstate-commerce jurisdiction second-circuit statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Second Circuit Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the district court had jurisdiction based on evidence supporting the interstate commerce element of the appellant's offense of conviction
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. HAS THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL ERRED IN ITS CONCLUSION THAT THE DISTRICT COURT HAD JURISDICTION BASED ON EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE ELEMENT OF APPELLANT'S OFFENSE OF CONVICTION? ii.
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-05-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 12, 2023)
2023-04-12
Application (22A895) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 19, 2023.
2023-03-28
Application (22A895) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 19, 2023 to June 18, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent