No. 22-7768

Nidal Ayyad v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure direct-appeal double-jeopardy habeas-corpus resentencing section-2255 sentencing sentencing-review vacatur
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether, following the vacatur of a count of conviction (either on direct appeal or via a § 2255 motion), the district court must resentence the defendant de novo on the remaining counts

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, following the vacatur of a count of conviction (either on direct appeal or via a § 2255 motion), the district court must resentence the defendant de novo on the remaining counts. i

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Nidal Ayyad
Peter J TomaoPeter J. Tomao, Esq., Petitioner
Peter J TomaoPeter J. Tomao, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent