No. 22-7769

Tyrone Desante Morant v. Bill Stange, Warden

Lower Court: Missouri
Docketed: 2023-06-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 6th-amendment 8th-amendment consecutive-sentences constitutional-rights eighth-amendment juvenile-sentencing mandatory-life-sentence miller-v-alabama sentencing-discretion
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Mandatory-life-without-parole-for-juvenile-offenders

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : Missouri’s former first-degree murder statute, Section 565.020, RSMo, mandated a sentence of life without parole for any offender who committed the offense as a juvenile. Did this mandatory sentencing scheme skew the sentencing : proceeding as to any non-homicide counts, by rendering the sentences on those counts immaterial, so as not to warrant the presentation of mitigating evidence, argument, or consideration of the defendant’s individualized circumstances, in violation of the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and thereby create a structural error warranting a new sentencing proceeding? Section 558.047, RSMo 2016, intended to remedy violations of Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), by granting the possibility of parole after twenty-five years to any offender who had received a mandatory sentence of life without parole for the crime of first-degree murder committed as a juvenile. But does this statute truly remedy the Eighth Amendment violation when a defendant can receive consecutive sentences for non-homicide offenses and thus delay any individualized consideration of the offender’s circumstances and any opportunity for release until well into old age? i

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
Reply of petitioner Tyrone Desante Morant filed. (Distributed)
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-10-23
Brief of respondent Bill Stange, Warden in opposition filed.
2023-09-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 23, 2023.
2023-09-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 22, 2023 to October 23, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-08-23
Response Requested. (Due September 22, 2023)
2023-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Bill Stange, Warden
Andrew Jacob CraneMissouri Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Andrew Jacob CraneMissouri Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Andrew Tyler BaileyMissouri Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Andrew Tyler BaileyMissouri Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Tyrone Desante Morant
Rosemary Ellen PercivalMO State Public Defender, Petitioner
Rosemary Ellen PercivalMO State Public Defender, Petitioner