No. 22-7771
Jaden Rene Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3583 acceptance-of-responsibility criminal-sentencing due-process federal-procedure incarceration liberty liberty-deprivation sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court unreasonably sentenced Petitioner to a higher than necessary sentence by denying Petitioner's points for acceptance of responsibility based on unrelated, incarcerated conduct, thus depriving the Petitioner of liberty within the terms of 18 U.S.C. 3583 (c) and (d)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the District Court unreasonably sentenced Petitioner to a higher than necessary sentence by denying Petitioner’s points for acceptance of responsibility based on unrelated, incarcerated conduct, thus depriving the Petitioner of liberty within the terms of 18 U.S.C. 3583 (c) and (d). 1, ees
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2023)
Attorneys
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent