No. 22-7772

Stanley Jackson, III v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act constitutional-rights criminal-sentencing due-process jury-factfinding jury-trial prior-convictions sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Constitution requires an indictment, jury trial, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find a defendant's prior convictions were 'committed on occasions different from one another

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Constitution requires an indictment, jury trial, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced penalty under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). 2. Whether the Sixth Amendment limits a sentencing court, when determining whether a defendant’s prior offenses were “committed on occasions different from one another,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), to consider only matters a jury found or a prior guilty plea necessarily admitted. i

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-08

Attorneys

Stanley Jackson, III
Laura Elizabeth Davis — Petitioner
Laura Elizabeth Davis — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent