No. 22-7774

Duane E. Armstrong v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: burden-of-proof constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence expert-testimony fingerprint-analysis forensic-evidence trial-procedure
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the court's need a second analyst to testifies, to the first analyst opinion containing veracious of petitioner's finger print?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Before the Supreme Court review during trial in front of a jury. Does the court’s need a second analyst to testifies, to the first analyst opinion containing veracious of petitioner’s finger print? } | 2 7

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 13, 2023)
2023-05-10
Application (22A983) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 9, 2023.
2023-05-01
Application (22A983) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 10, 2023 to July 9, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Duane E. Armstrong
Duane E. Armstrong — Petitioner
Duane E. Armstrong — Petitioner