Did Mr. Ueding hold the right to challenge his state convictions in a habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED In the first Issues questions of discussion for this court to consider is: Did Mr. Ueding hold the right to challenge his state convictions in a habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254? Was the United States District Courts dismissal of the action without authority and caused prejudice? This court shall find cause in the independent topics of 1. Presentation of a Constitutional Speedy Trial in the State Trial Court; 2. Presentation of a Constitutional Speedy Trial in the Highest State Court; 3. The Right to File and Available Relief in a Habeas Corpus for Violations of Constitutional and State Laws; and 4. Prejudice of Habeas Corpus upon the Filing of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation to Show a Schematic Whole in the Dismissal of Ueding’s Claim. In the second Issues questions of discussion for this court to rule is: Did the state trial court violate Ueding’s constitutional and statutory right to speedy trial which this court holds the power to rule on federal and state rights to his claim. And does Mr. Ueding request and is he entitled to the remedy of a discharge from custody. In this issue the topics of independent discussions for a schematic whole are: 1. The Arraignment Procedures and Dates; 2. The Preliminary Hearing Procedures and Date; 3. The Speedy Trial Process and Calculations; and 4. Preservation of Right and Remedies. .