Whether prison officials can require prisoners to show centrality in religious exercise, and whether prison officials can regulate prisoners' sincerity and religiosity

QUESTIONS PRESENTED. A. WHETHER PRISON OFFICIALS CAN REQUIRE PRISONERS TO SHOW . , . CENTRALITY IN W-DOC'S RRIS APPLICATION PROCESS FOR REQUESTING . RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATIONS, AND WHETHER PRISON OFFICIALS CAN . REGULATE PRISONERS SINCERITY AND RELIGIOSITY UNDER THEIR. SOLE ; ; DETERMINATION AND DISCRETION. pp. 7+12 B. WHETHER PRISON OFFICIALS HAVE THE BURDEN TO CHALLENGE SINCERITY ° ; AND RELIGIOSITY, AND WHETHER THERE WAS A THRESHOLD FACT QUESTION : AS TO MR.ENTLER'S SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS FOR THE STATE : COURTS TO RESOLVE. pp. 12-18; . : . . C. WHETHER PROHIBITING RELIGIOUS EXERCISE UNLESS A ‘PRISONER : PROVIDES A RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY, OR PROHIBITING INDIVIDUAL RELIGIOUS EXERCISES, IMPOSE A SUBSTANTIAL BURDEN. pp. 18-21; : D. WHETHER PRISON OFFCIIALS CAN RELY ON ALTERNATIVE SECOND BEST : OPTIONS OF RELIGIOUS EXERCISE AS A BASES OF CLAIMING THEY ARE NOT IMPOSING A SUBSTANTIAL BURDEN ON PRISONERS RELIGIOUS : EXERCISE. pp. 21-26; ‘and ; €. WHETHER PRISON OFFICIALS CAN RELY ON POST HOC RATIONALIZATIONS . “THAT DG NOT MEET RLUIPA'S STRICT SCRUTINY STANDARD TO MEET THEIR BURDENS UNDER RLUIPA. pp. 26-37. : /// : ; . /// i , : | Ltt re . /// : Vf : Vf ‘ ; ; . : . /// ; ; : 7 : . ii.