Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in revoking Petitioner's supervised release based solely on his admission to accessing the internet without permission, without any finding of a substantive violation of the conditions of his supervised release
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Petitioner pleaded guilty, after waiving pretrial motions, to one count of possession of child pornography in 2009. In July 2021, the probation office sought revocation of Petitioner’s supervised release. On August 24, 2021, Petitioner appeared in court on the revocation petition, waived an evidentiary hearing on the allegations within that revocation petition, and, through his then-attorney, indicated a willingness to admit to having “violated the condition of being on the — accessing the internet without permission.” Transcript of Supervised Release Revocation Hearing,
2023-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-27
Reply of petitioner James B. Norris, Jr. filed. (Distributed)
2023-11-13
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-10-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 13, 2023.
2023-10-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 13, 2023 to November 13, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-09-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 13, 2023.
2023-09-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 13, 2023 to October 13, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-08-14
Response Requested. (Due September 13, 2023)
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2023)