No. 22-7812

Miguel A. Cisneros v. Trent Allen, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-rights conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-procedure jury-instructions legal-standing
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-01-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state court's admission of erroneous evidence violated the petitioner's 14th Amendment due process rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ' Question for Keview:, On 2] |) THe Steves Wawa Comet Deeision ONADMusSion OF Erroeous Foon... 3 | Llicnaneerc Ror an TTS Cvipence € oBBERL. TS Incluiers Decigen 4 ||Vioisterm Fetmioner’ 8 14. Ament>mear: Due Paocess Olone CWwit TTS WEIGHE: & . ry . ° . . + * . + . ye . . ay : 9 |] 2) TRE Staves Trial Court DECISION TO THE Errovens Dome 10 [Sesion eee © raat ae ops a th Commission for Cae \jpekiwG . ITS Decision Cours IUSUFFiCMmcot TO Corvicr i7|} PETIMONER. . iolAaTIAG “Us... IW. Omentment Que Fkocess F6l louwmne BEM erm 6) Amentmmecsts He DECISION tWelUDES TRE COVSTTTaTONsl 4 || (ig That Secure'scime Fol Peotecnon oF The ensornA@e DauGr 45] Starqouedts . FSW TRE PROSECUTIONS Kuscon tout OF Kran inGle, tol] Knowints TS UNE False WiTRe'ss aw TES Tinie 7 Bes Goines all Sceie ee Carvienmon ..., Axo Never Rese xT €a VARGUIR. © THE is [CRimical Glemects COTE! Tt rece ce:”.) False Cece wr 2 || 3.) Te States Tail Court Decision oF TRE Eeronecs AMES Jur. _ uf DusTructon . JUQ+y TRETRUETION, CalChimn 376. )->JTS Decision nuUCIUTES 2 || THE Violation OF IU. AmeATDmMectT Due Rocess Followmw6 THe SH an GTA 23 Ore tomes S THE Richt AS A Wi VERDICT AND THe iCHT TS «A [Lary eV Dustaucsnon THe WMERNIN 6S ote Fol Protecnen GO] The 25H eSesoWAGlE Daier STacoeedSmuctual Kron’ CAUsimoe's. rad . i ; 28 | s)he Wir Cmcurt COURTS DECISION STATING HIRT FE TITONE ApPEllact, 99 [Hace NST SHON SU BsnecTial VIOUSTESN CE CONSTI Teal IRIE ViGha TIONS 30 |] Buwtr> The SuBStacAl ReieSove Ble MereaTe WHeTHEen THE ° [Se Femeonl Paste Cauncr § LECIRIONS Gu RETIRE Srount> Gams | ON THE COnSTITATIONAl IGE Voletons WUHIGH Harm Cxccurem.. Gir [Also TRE mest Depeals Ennee RUNRG& Ge Clams Ants TRE Of WHICH TT Miabe A Comicon Qu TRE AmAUSSIOn GE THE UNcHARGEID Reon | | Ortran@a Tr DercEr> Same That” Rome INCIDENTS ERE: SHERI ey | 4 |e) Tae Feet Appeal Deeisiow Ov TTS Kutter wie was Gerovecus | 5 | Armanca (AFA ORE ConvicTion ent TRE SweTe Tiel Conrer Detison, 7 | SuericreThy muce DRPERenT BETNEE Ove en PROMS Smee § || Gecnuse. UNmen THE Firauact €vim Come Sol. Lb). . Aye vic Cerne 9 }S 352. bo). TT Must” Keveese ITS JUPEMERT lanes ConvmiéTiin 0 WA. TT Wag Onto Commies «0 versal Crnoe..,., , _ " hy. iolaTie Co DEFER raanT PeTiTiemee Due thosss. ran i . | (3 [9 "ie Se s Tis! Reveesal Centon... Am SMucTusl Seen | iu |. | | | | . ( , i | _ , |

Docket Entries

2024-01-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
2023-10-27
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 17, 2023)

Attorneys

Miguel A. Cisneros
Miguel Angel Cisneros — Petitioner
Miguel Angel Cisneros — Petitioner