Did the District of Columbia Court of Appeals violate existing laws and breach its duty to protect the substantive rights of a pro se litigant

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (DCCA), violate exiting laws guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, and breached its duty to protect and preserve the substantive right of pro se litigant “petitioner Onyinye Jideani,” | when granting the respondent “Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.’s | (formerly Hilton Hotel Corporation) renewed Motion for Summary Affirmance “and on the lower court's October 21, 2022 unlawful and unjudicial dismissal of petitioner's May 09, 2022 Unlawful Discriminatory Practice claim civil action suit | against the respondent, “for Want of Prosecution” (of which this petition for Wr — of | Certiorari is taken),” if in-fact petitioner Onyinye Jid and pursued her civil action suit with “procedural, sufficient, and timely” filings, in the lower court “(the District of Columbia Superior Court civil action division),” and as shown in the courts docket case No. 2022 CA 002012 B? (Dismi issued on October 25, 2022). Want of Prosecution is defined in the Black Law dictionary, as “failure of a litigant to pursue the case." (See DCCA Appeal case No. 22-CV-866) A. Did the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, erred when disregarding the | lower court's failed cognizance and abuse of process, on petitioner Onyinye Jideani's May 09, 2022 substantially justificed Unlawful Discriminatory Practice claim suit aganist the respondent Hilton Worldwide Hold Inc. | (formerly Hilton Hotel Corporation), and when the District of Columbia Superior Court civ. act. divison "under judge Robert R. Rigsby” dismissed the May 09, 2022 suit for Want of Prosecution during the first and only hearing held via WebEx webcam on October 21, 2022? (The lower court's dismissal order was issued on October 25, 2022). All supporting evidences were submitted to the D.C. Appeals court (DCCA) "Appeal case No. 22-CV-866," appealing the lower court's unjust, unjudicial, and erroneous decision. B. Did the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, fail to redress the lower court's unjust error, and when the "District of Columbia Superior Court civ. action division” unlawfully dismissed the petitioner Onyinye Jideani's May 09, 2022 Unlawful Discriminatiory Practice claim suit for Wa of Prosecution, fasely alleging that because petitioner Onyinye Jideani did not attend the initial conference hearing "(referred to as a status hear "and for good cause shown," petitioner Onyinye Jideani did not plead her case? (The lower court's dismissal order was issued on October 25, 2022). All supporting evidence were submitted to the D.C. Appeals court (DCCA) "Appeal case No. 22-CV-866," appealing the lower court's unjust, unjudicial, and pg: a of ad