No. 22-7820
Annamalai Annamalai v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion due-process fair-trial impartiality judicial-bias judicial-discretion judicial-recusal recusal sentencing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion by failing to recuse itself due to the appearance of impartiality
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether the district court abused its discretion by failing to recuse itself due to the appearance of impartiality when the court’s remarks at sentencing reflected such a deep-seated antagonism that made fair judgment impossible, including calling the defendant evil and stating that the court’s contempt for Mr. Annamalai was “without affectation.” i
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 20, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent