Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the government's actions

No question identified. : CEDDTED! UN PREC | QUESTION(S) DINTED @ Cow OU Locate, One ConstiuTion ALLY Reouneety (sce ve Brau) Laws FOL. SaGuATUue NAME, TESTEE OF PaocESS OF ANYONE TmpaeTsal On i ee cee OE darn MISCO Cruse. Udon M Acrupt. Swen Arexdsver oF Ceruina Comp bent | AND MAVE You EVER ta) Vou CACEER. SEEN TUAT BERLE P¢ ee oie 6 What woud you Do LF youR Son Nruesrere o@ Loves ne WAS CULES worn A Cerme By CISD pws aS Credle pray Bavane __ ov Lodlen Ar TUEre. Consrimaewate Lerosicaery (Bares NEF OMA Dac ume AND Coals FEN NO ATIEST, Men MFAIMATION OF ADE, CeAnd Jur te 60 Claud (sump oe Ser)? Wh wourts You Sso P 4 WHAT 2S THE BUCIES LAWS DEEINTTTON oF A Tee Bruen Ants Can! er LEbatLy BE LET'VOID oF Any Apetuation ° Mo snp? © TT E BLACKS |AW DERINZTIN OF A ‘Due Soe) NC exya a As C4c tT LEGALLY BE LEFT ‘Voos Or Avenues ° @ WHY WASN'T ANY LAWFUL (ewree Rule 55.1) Gunmen Due frocess” RocunmtS Fried tw UE | hoecederres [eesror lk Kinwagowe| OF Q fkeplzs Rovy AceinsT HIS WILL 173 maLES From N.D.N.Y Y ; Drow pocs MR Pegoes féoUp 173 mews Psy orem OBurouS Frroulear Ween, NO -Hee-Latmsaay Heacincs ON A “BIANKURAT ee fe owe ADDI TIONAL QUESTIONS wY i Me Olt HY [LI TY DLE GERACE aye AUS. A MIARANCOLA HBduRe C/Al~ pees RY 1S zy OTH of (HreR RULT St Sari YOK Al MR PEEOLE ceed To _karse Tuprement AY) laws Abecparer Dssues wen WE REcoe 55 Ko lo Docker; SeuTenernts Ab Dargecr fppenl (eucaey SHow A VALTAN | EFFORT + —ast Fy COURT/BOARD CERTIFIED FORNS IKTC DOCUMENT EXAMINER PeoVEDES You Gyr A Swoens AFF roavit, Stwweaer SHE SrenAtuge of Youve DECEASES Lwe 6we es ON A Cover Paces Place ON TOP of THE N90. ACTUAL “Swoes Argrrmaver torm A BlAnld . Fax... Nor AN Of/GiNAL og EVEN A CoP OF O£2.G L “ConTainine No DNK Srey jae OULD THAT BE Ok tJTTY YOU P @IARE THE JUSTECES OF JHES SUKKEM ICOURT COING JO UNPRECEDENTEDL\ COING TO DENY ME my CONSTETUTIONAL., Cen zen_ And my Rreuro A Veerfiasle : ee OF Fkobsble Cruse 3 JUACEC |