No. 22-7829
James Platte, Jr. v. Sarah Schroeder, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process hybrid-representation judicial-discretion self-representation standing trial-court
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court's substitution of hybrid representation over self-representation violate petitioners' constitutional rights?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | DID THE TRIAL COURT'S SUBSTITUTION OF HYBRID | REPRESENTATION OVER SELF-REPRESENTATION VIOLATE | PETITIONERS CONSTITUTION RIGHTS? |
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-20
Waiver of right of respondent Sarah Schroeder, Warden to respond filed.
2023-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 21, 2023)
Attorneys
Sarah Schroeder, Warden
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent