No. 22-7835

Francisco Antonio Cordova v. Maria Luisa Camacho

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-06-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: bankruptcy-discharge child-support civil-procedure civil-rights creditor-harassment due-process judicial-misconduct notice property property-rights right-to-be-heard
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-11-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the Los Angeles Superior Court deny an American Citizen their Due Process rights to adequate notice and the right to be heard when depriving them of their property?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Can the Los Angeles Superior Court deny an American Citizen their Due Process rights to adequate notice and the right to be heard when depriving them of their property? 2. Can the California Superior Court ignore my Homestead Exemption filed on | August 14, 2020, regarding my primary home residence? 3. Can the California Supreme Court ignore the Federal Bankruptcy Order discharged March 11, 2022? Accordingly, can the California Supreme Court | allow two creditors, properly listed in the Bankruptcy Order, to collect on a legally discharged debt (Attorney’s fees)? | 4. What are the penalties against creditors who harass former debtors who were properly discharged by Bankruptcy Order? 5. Can the Los Angeles County Child Support Services violate and ignore two separate orders modifying child support and custody orders? | 6. Can a California judge order the retroactive payment of rents spanning 13 years without a prior court order? | 7. Can a judge order property, separately purchased before any legal marriage, : to be sold in dissolution proceedings? 8. Can Los Angeles County Child Support (DCSS) collect debts without first filing a proof of claim breakdown sheet? 9. Can DCSS demand payment in the amount of $268,704.94 when the judgment Order required payment in the sum of $55,899.40? : 2 10.Can a California Superior Court judge instruct Respondent Camacho to not pay the U.S. backed mortgage security and keep the money from rents in the sum of $39,550.00? 11.Can a DCSS attomey fail to disclose the sum owed and in doing so mislead the court? 3

Docket Entries

2023-11-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-25
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-28
Waiver of right of respondent California Department of Child Support Services to respond filed.
2023-06-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 21, 2023)

Attorneys

California Department of Child Support Services
Ricardo EnriquezCalifornia Dept. of Justice Office of the Attorney, Respondent
Francisco A. Cordova
Francisco Antonio Cordova — Petitioner