Whether the last sentence of the Ninth Circuit's pattern jury instruction on reasonable doubt is an incorrect statement of the law and akin to a directed verdict

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the last sentence of the Ninth Circuit’s pattern jury instruction on reasonable doubt, telling jurors that “if after a careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence, you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty, it is your duty to find the defendant guilty” is an incorrect statement of the law and is akin to a directed verdict?