No. 22-7846

Vance Collins v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bruton-v-united-states codefendant codefendant-statement confrontation-clause crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure hearsay out-of-court-statement sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause are violated by the admission of a non-testifying codefendant's out-of-court statement

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment are violated by the admission of a non-testifying codefendant’s out-ofcourt statement where references to the defendant are either deleted or replaced with neutral pronouns, but the statement still facially incriminates the defendant due to surrounding context. i

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2023)
2023-04-19
Application (22A912) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 19, 2023.
2023-04-18
Application (22A912) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 19, 2023 to June 18, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Vance Collins
Eric R BreslinDuane Morris LLP, Petitioner
Eric R BreslinDuane Morris LLP, Petitioner