No. 22-7846
Vance Collins v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bruton-v-united-states codefendant codefendant-statement confrontation-clause crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure hearsay out-of-court-statement sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause are violated by the admission of a non-testifying codefendant's out-of-court statement
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment are violated by the admission of a non-testifying codefendant’s out-ofcourt statement where references to the defendant are either deleted or replaced with neutral pronouns, but the statement still facially incriminates the defendant due to surrounding context. i
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2023)
2023-04-19
Application (22A912) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 19, 2023.
2023-04-18
Application (22A912) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 19, 2023 to June 18, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Vance Collins
Eric R Breslin — Duane Morris LLP, Petitioner
Eric R Breslin — Duane Morris LLP, Petitioner