No. 22-7847
Colum Patrick Moran v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process insufficient-evidence judicial-precedent plain-error precedent standard-of-review statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a conviction predicated on insufficient evidence can meet the plain error standard in the absence of explicit statutory language or on point, binding precedent that specifically and directly addresses the exact issue.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a conviction predicated on insufficient evidence can meet the plain error standard in the absence of explicit statutory language or on-point, binding precedent that specifically and directly addresses the exact issue
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-26
Reply of petitioner Colum Patrick Moran filed.
2023-10-13
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-09-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 13, 2023.
2023-09-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 13, 2023 to October 13, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-08-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 13, 2023.
2023-08-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 14, 2023 to September 13, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-07-14
Response Requested. (Due August 14, 2023)
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2023)
Attorneys
Colum Patrick Moran
Melissa Fussell — Federal Defender, MDFL, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent