No. 22-7849

Jensen Ken Alexander v. Joseph Ely, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure damages due-process free-speech judicial-discretion legal-standards religious-claims standing state-court-review
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the regional ombudsman and the officials of the Common Cause Task Force violated the Petitioner's First Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Dg Wt 3 Q QUESTION(S) ye he Ui ‘ NWN T Densen) Proving. Griaia © the ‘ OMBASMAN apart de Fes un ‘She cow We site anny ia Re SEEMS WAS Ved gn as MouNsE)™ HY He Waren. any REGIONE! ombud Arnot seals VATS Whe Common Fale TAS, common Fg rane One SebUsi At Pmenoment RAGWS Umer he US coustindion 7 t Tense Kent the decision oF Ye Wer * ] woeshT Ye mowing o€ having NON Coleg a “who Wed On Me Greseavee tave’ chen SROENCE MONS Yor Hoe Resreil) “EouNOW" GeJanes You have Goad Grounds yo Get telter HEE OF hese CG) 45 ve ‘ ly FWD monet damages ? DAS Yeo VIM An) Yue REGiow al ombulsman PEC Reviewing 4 Face * AUS CASS WANG Wr came Pnstyse o& Hy at S Ane Tacks ny TNE. AE Apel CMS SOKO oat) cdlecl! Pe Common TKS Tris, 1 hel VW See ant vivlabionS would wh he 4 \ eOnING Wied Ve Grievance? (Sd 945 unGomned 7 ‘ we HIsvT all cd(os meals, REULGOS CalkennGs Relies doctrines, Relisys Vams BAC care under Ye 4 Arrenower of Ye US consttetion 2 BH 2G Yor Violeta Sonton® cdiGious Meals Relicisus \ ies . RALwOIS Yongs VT quo Vase Hace ale x Cathy ines; Relisiws ockines ae , ND BY UR Homme oe? We VS Constrvtion, TE You vielake Pese Pings poesak MmeNS YOu howe vdadal rock Cersonls) 2% Panewment RGUES oF Ure US Const rroHon “ A ulet Vid We VAGINA Deets oF CORON Reisen ot(idals matte He Common ace CAT wasnt re Suefose 9 VADC mains Ye Command Car lil wos mo We Rwesoals) SeWiNG, CORANG, handling, CooinG, WATE The common Fre TAS, ~ty UWeek Var common Fore TONS Sehescte Kon Noe ReoJar jays 7 , , Lot WIAS fo Fesech Someone dasndk Ane WyeHs v€ Vor woman Gale hel ws 5 SD vessee Yagoude Ye wert Nod handle Me Grmond CR Vat T , KNOLD’ GreNAnles OND WE Lo brat Awe OER wh Da aoven Rates Xe Common ACL “Wats AND SUNS ON L Prneasbinenrt Ricks of Ye VS consrvkion LSNT Lese dekewdewrt(s} ace. to be held KESTONSILE Hoe Mic vsraniG Aine 4 aud isn't Sensend deSenen te be Awadeg won Vywases AGainsy all Yee Ackerman) Lishen in is case?

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2023)

Attorneys

Jensen Alexander
Jensen Alexander — Petitioner
Jensen Alexander — Petitioner