No. 22-7850

In Re James C. Winding

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-06-22
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment attorney-general civil-rights criminal-conviction due-process federal-court habeas-corpus judicial-review mississippi-court procedural-challenge standing state-court
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the U.S. Supreme Court should review the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi that upheld the Mississippi Supreme Court's refusal to consider the petitioner's claim that the state court order deprived him of his rights to life and liberty under the Fourteenth Amendment

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED CO Fhe UWS Suphime Cos Shouls Packie? US Cont nt Nopeat (Leh Circ’) aud Us Distetoe Cont for Sarthe Disk os Mess issrpp) Qua misdssippt Supreme Corts ecel block Pe +i tio NOC Jute [gnendni 0 Cloin Lia gone SepcBad GO order 16 deprive hain ot his Rights +s Lpfe ob Li'bety to be Pree Loe UstaMab/ TL ego} de-terstio5, ) Newer leroy Chacae (rw Seve DyarrecY 2 (2) 3-8)

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-05-24
Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2023)

Attorneys

James C. Winding
James C. Winding — Petitioner
James C. Winding — Petitioner