No. 22-7862
Tags: cause-exception circuit-split constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus procedural-default residual-clause vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015), establishes 'cause' to excuse procedurally defaulted 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claims that are predicated on the unconstitutionally vague residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015), establishes “cause” to excuse procedurally defaulted 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claims that are predicated on the unconstitutionally vague residual clause in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B). i
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Lazaro Veliz
Anshu Suresh Budhrani — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Anshu Suresh Budhrani — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent