No. 22-7866
IFP
Tags: due-process eighth-amendment federal-authorization finality-of-mandate intellectual-disability mandate-reversal retroactivity supreme-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must-Hall-v.-Florida-be-applied-retroactively
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Must Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. 701 (2014), be applied retroactively by state courts because it substantively expanded the class of individuals who qualify as intellectually disabled under the Eighth Amendment? 2. Did the Florida Supreme Court’s reversal of its long-final mandate granting Hall retroactivity to Petitioner specifically, coupled with Petitioner’s reasonable and detrimental reliance on the finality of that mandate, violate federal due process? i LIST OF DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-07
Reply of petitioner Frank Walls filed.
2023-07-26
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2023-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Florida
Frank Walls