No. 22-7883
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-claims criminal-procedure due-process judicial-interpretation jurisdiction legal-standing speedy-trial standing state-court-review
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Illinois Supreme Court violated the petitioner's constitutional right to a speedy trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | > Pot oner is asking this court +e order the Tlinots , Supreme Cour +b upheld my constihdhonal ni alt AD speedy 2> Polk ener \S asking 4%s court 4 order He itincis Supreme Court te upheld Qule 413d), 4I5(q) Concerning Ty consthihonal right to oa Speedy tri a and thet Yo Dilincis Supreme Court ond court of appeal allowed ~ho Avi al court Yo Creode “Ks own defindion of Ye word beloy" ra
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 27, 2023)
2023-04-05
Application (22A866) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until June 22, 2023.
2023-03-28
Application (22A866) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 23, 2023 to June 22, 2023, submitted to Justice Barrett.