Did the defendant(s) violate the plaintiff voting rights which are protected by the Headlee Amendment and Michigan Constitution 1963, Article 9, Section 25-32, along with the Unlimited Tax Election Act of 1979; by issuing Unlimited Obligation Bonds without obtaining voter approval?

Questions Presented | | 1. Did the defendant(s) violate the plaintiff voting rights which are protected by the Headlee | Tax Amendment and Michigan Constitution 1963, Article 9, Section 25-32, along with the | Unlimited Tax Election Act of 1979; by issuing Unlimited Obligation Bonds without | ! obtaining voter approval? Yes | | 2. Did the defendant(s) violate the plaintiff's Due Process Right when they issued Revenue | Bonds, Refund Bonds, and Motor Vehicle Transportation Bonds without providing the plaintiff with Due Process Notice guaranteed by the 14" Amendment? Yes : 3. When the defendant(s) violated the Home Rule City Act 279 of 1909, The Revenue Bond | Act 94 of 1933, section 141.133, The Unlimited Tax Election Act 189, of 1979, and the | Michigan Revised Municipal Finance Act of 2001; was the plaintiff denied Equal Protection | : of the law? Yes 4. Does the opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals in this case, conflict with this court ! decision in Mullane v. Hanover, TR Co. U.S. 339, 306?Yes :