Christopher Ochoa v. United States
JusticiabilityDoctri
Is the discretion to order joint and several liability in restitution orders under 18 U.S.C. § 3664(h) limited by each defendant casual role in the casual process that underlies the victim's losses, as articulated by the Court's holding in Proline v United States, 572 U.S. 434 (2014), when the amount of restitution so large it is unlikely to be paid by any single defendant?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is the discretion to order joint and several liability in restitution orders under 18 U.S.C. § 3664(h) limited by each defendant casual role in the casual process that underlies the victim’s losses, as articulated by the Court’s holding in Proline v United States, 572 U.S. 434 (2014), when the amount of restitution so large it is unlikely to be paid by any single defendant? 1