No. 22-7897
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2244 eighth-amendment federal-petition habeas-corpus intellectual-disability retroactivity substantive-rule teague-v-lane
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Hall v. Florida necessarily 'made retroactive' for purposes of authorizing a successive federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Was Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. 701 (2014) necessarily “made retroactive,” for purposes of authorizing a successive federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A), by announcing a rule that substantively expanded the class of individuals who qualify as intellectually disabled under the Eighth Amendment? i LIST OF DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-07
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2023-08-07
Reply of petitioner Frank Walls filed. (Distributed)
2023-07-31
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2023-06-26
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Frank Walls
Sean Talmage Gunn — Federal Public Defender, N.D. Fla., Petitioner
Sean Talmage Gunn — Federal Public Defender, N.D. Fla., Petitioner
State of Florida