No. 22-7906
Lamar McDonald v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: apprendi-standard criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment sentencing sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation sufficiency-of-evidence void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Apprendi v. New Jersey Still Good Caselaw?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Is Apprendi v. New Jersey Still Good Caselaw? 2). If so Is Are the Lower Courts (Appeals Courts included) misapplying Apprendi and Mr. McDonald Fifth and Sixth Amendment to determine if the sufficiency of the evidence standard of review is correct? . 3) Is 18 U.S.C. 3661 unconstitutional under the Void for Vagueness Clause of the Fifth Amendment? . | | | | | | | j
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 31, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent