No. 22-794

Eurica Califorrniaa v. Katherine K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2023-02-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: abortion civil-rights dobbs-v-jackson due-process patent-law patent-term roe-v-wade specification-claims unborn-rights vuitch vuitch-precedent
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Securities Patent Trademark Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-05-11 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether United States v. Vuitch, 402 U.S. 62 (1971), should be overruled in favor of equality with the unborn?

Question Presented (from Petition)

Questions Presented Petitioner wholly owns United States Patent No. 10,245,075 directed to a “nondestructive means of. ectopic pregnancy management,” which teaches a non-homicidal alternative to traditional abortion. He appeals from respondent’s 51-day reduction of his patent term. The questions presented are: 1. Whether United States v. Vuitch, 402 U.S. 62 (1971), should be overruled in favor of equality with the unborn? 2. Whether 37 C.F.R. § 1.704(c)(10) lawfully reduces the patent term for an applicant’s refusal to surrender stewardship of the specification claims to the Examiner in deference to an unauthorized claim amendment contained in a notice of allowance?

Docket Entries

2023-05-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-05-08
Letter of petitioner Eurica Califorrniaa received.
2023-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-20
2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-14
Letter of petitioner Eurica Califorrniaa received.
2023-03-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-03-03
Waiver of right of respondent Vidal, Katherine K. to respond filed.
2023-02-17

Attorneys

Eurica Califorrniaa
Eurica Califorrniaa — Petitioner
Eurica Califorrniaa — Petitioner
Vidal, Katherine K.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent