No. 22-83

B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. Kim Embry, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-enforcement declaratory-relief injunctive-relief legal-immunity noerr-pennington noerr-pennington-doctrine standing state-actors unconstitutional-laws
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Noerr-Pennington doctrine immunizes state actors

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the judge-made Noerr-Pennington doctrine immunizes state actors who seek to enforce unconstitutional laws and regulations.

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent Kim Embry, et al. to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-07-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 29, 2022)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word Count

Attorneys

B&G Foods North America, Inc.
Forrest A. Hainline III — BraunHagey & Borden LLP, Petitioner
Kim Embry, et al.
Craig M. Nicholas — Nicholas &, Respondent