No. 22-835

Bradley Hester v. Matthew Gentry

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-03
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: bail-practices civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process eleventh-circuit pretrial-liberty public-safety standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-06-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause protects a fundamental right to pretrial liberty

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Due Process Clause protects a fundamental right to pretrial liberty that prevents states from depriving a presumptively innocent person of physical liberty pending a criminal trial unless a court finds that the deprivation is necessary to protect public safety and/or reasonably assure the person’s appearance at future court proceedings. @

Docket Entries

2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-16
Reply of petitioner Bradley Hester filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2023-05-03
Brief of respondent Matthew Gentry in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2023-04-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 3, 2023.
2023-04-03
Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars of Bail filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2023-04-03
Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2023-04-03
Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2023-03-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 3, 2023 to May 3, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2023)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendix
2023-02-01
Application (22A684) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 18, 2023.
2023-01-27
Application (22A684) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 16, 2023 to March 18, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Main DocumentMain Document

Attorneys

American Bar Association
Deborah Delores Enix-Ross — American Bar Association, Amicus
Bradley Hester
Seth P. Waxman — Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Petitioner
Cato Institute
Clark M. Neily III — Cato Institute, Amicus
Legal Scholars of Bail
James F. Bogan III — Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Amicus
Matthew Gentry
Jamie Helen Kidd Frawley — Webb McNeill Walker PC, Respondent